It’s Okay To Shop At Walmart (Sometimes)

OP-ED
It's a struggle. Big box shopping, or small independent? We’ve drawn our personal battle lines, somewhere, but right and wrong get so damn blurry in these retail wars. Of course we’re against the notion of minimum-wage slave labor, Union-busting working conditions, destruction of local economies, but really… how cool is contact solution for under $2?

The fact of the matter is however much we decry the cost-cutting, economy sucking, no-benefits antics of our nation’s most profitable retailer, we all shop there. It wouldn’t be the nation’s most profitable retailer if we didn’t. If you’re reading this blog, odds are pretty good that you’re already a penny pinching fanatic, yourself. You’ve probably run down the aisles of the big box, drunkenly singing the praises of cheap toilet paper and two-for-one macaroni and cheese. But when you get home, you’re a little hung over from all the sinfully fun spending, a little guilt stricken by your shameless chatter with the checkout girl, aren’t you?

Did those falling prices land on your conscience kind of hard?

I have a theory, however, that I’m now giving to the nation for the inexplicably low price of free.

Stop me if I sound crazy. But. It’s okay to shop at Walmart…sometimes.

I think a lot of people become so guilt stricken about going to Walmart, however, that they’re now afraid to show their face in the little family grocer down the block, fearing they’ll leave incriminating orange fingerprints from that economy-sized bag of Cheetos they’ve been snacking on, or that their new cost-conscious MP3 player will start beeping in their pocket like a tell-tale heart. But this isn’t a red state, blue state decision—it doesn’t have to be all or nothing.

One trip to those little stores, once a weeks or so, means a lot to them--a lot more than you might think. Do you always go to the large chain to buy your groceries? Is it really necessary to get the best deal every time? Probably not. Your budget, so buffered by $8 t-shirts and twelve packs of tighty-whities, can probably handle the occasional $5 frozen pizza from the corner store. Spending a bit of money at the small stores, and even the smaller chains, keeps valuable competition alive.

Don’t worry, it doesn’t have to be your life’s mission.

You don’t have to put on hemp sandals and always buy organic, but because you have to shop for food every week, why not take one or two of your five shopping trips a month, and splurge a little on the local economy? Think of it as flossing your teeth. Yes, the dentist wants you to do it after every glass of water, but for those of us who lie to their white-masked faces and keep an every-other-day routine, we’re still in pretty good oral shape.

About that guilt.

Conversely, while yes, you are supporting ‘ol Sam’s chain when you get your CDs for a song, you aren’t supporting them that much. While they’re too big to feel any huge economic loss if you personally stop shopping (that’s what you tell yourself, isn’t it?) they’re also so big you don’t help them that much when you step under their big tin roof. The geriatric greeter may make your feel pretty darn special, but to those baleful yellow smiles watching you from the tops of the sales racks, you’re just one of many brick in the wall(mart).

Let me put it another way (because the last paragraph probably only made sense to me). $10 isn’t going to make-or-break Walmart if you spend it at their store, so to keep your budget under control, go and buy a few bags of pretzels. $10 to the local grocer may make-or-break it, however, so make sure you go buy your Wonder Bread there, every now and then.

5 comments:

Jason Dean July 31, 2007 5:21 PM  

"minimum-wage slave labor"

Wal-Mart's employees work for the wage that is determined by the market for their skills. They are not "slaves." There is real slave labor in this world, and suffice to say, they don't get paid $5.15 an hour. In fact, few Wal-Mart employees get paid this little. I think Wal-Mart does a lot more to improve local economies than it does to "destroy" them. Wal-Mart saves the average U.S. family $2,800 a year. It does it by being the best. Nobody is forced to shop there and nobody is forced to work there. I choose to do neither, for the most part. But that doesn't mean I wish to impose my own personal preference for Target or even a local store with better service, on people as a whole. Wherever we shop should always be a personal choice, but if I did shop at Wal-Mart more regularly, I certainly wouldn't feel guilty about it.

Anonymous,  July 31, 2007 10:44 PM  

I'm not a fan of walmart, but i go there for certain items when I want a deal.

Ethically, I'm somewhat opposed to the way they do business, but not passionately opposed. I just prefer Target.

Really, I avoid them mostly because it is an unpleasant shopping experience. If I'm at target and the lines get a teeny bit long, I hear them say "cashiers to the green side!" and people open up another lane. At walmart, tough luck, it's always crowded, no service... Just unpleasant overall.

Starving Artist July 31, 2007 11:29 PM  

Hey Jason and Anonymous, thanks for the comments! Jason, I think WalMart has provided a lot of lessons-learned with their business model, but the $2,800 a year in savings rapidly disappears when you take into account the massive lobbying efforts that WalMart has been a part of to keep the minimum wage down to its lowest adjusted levels since 1950. Effective July 24th 2008, the minimum wage will be $1.40/hr more than $5.15, which is, coincidentally, about $2,800 a year.

If the market (read WalMart) were actually allowed to set the wage, you would see real slave labor. They aren't, however, because we've seen what companies and individuals will do when they're allowed to make the rules.

Jonathan August 1, 2007 3:43 AM  

I think the best way is to keep both voting with your dollars (by not shopping there IF you don't like it) and by voting literally during elections. Lobbying definitely works, but so does the prospect of voter backlash.

I only shop at Walmart to get my Pert Plus shampoo, since Target doesn't carry it :P

Starving Artist August 1, 2007 9:45 AM  

Thanks Janathan! I hear you.

With respect to my last comment, please strike "and individuals" from the last sentence. It makes it sound like I don't believe in the democratic process!

About This Blog

Blog Archive

Text

To be filled

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP